一种基于局部冲突分配的DST组合规则

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2012.09.028

电子学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 1880-1884.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2012.09.028

一种基于局部冲突分配的DST组合规则

权文¹, 王晓丹¹, 王坚^1,2, 张玉玺¹

1. 空军工程大学导弹学院, 陕西三原 713800;
2. 西北工业大学计算机学院, 陕西西安 710072

收稿日期:2011-09-05 修回日期:2012-03-18 出版日期:2012-09-25
- 作者简介:
- 权文 女,1983年9月出生于陕西蒲城.博士生.主要研究方向为智能信息处理和机器学习等研究. E-mail:937182228@qq.com王晓丹女,1966年9月出生于陕西汉中.1988年毕业于国防科技大学计算机系.现为空军工程大学教授、博士生导师,从事智能信息处理与机器学习方面的研究工作. E-mail:afeu_-w@yahoo.com.cn 王坚 男,1982年2月出生于陕西白水.博士生.主要研究方向为数据管理. E-mail:lovewj221@qq.com张玉玺男,1976年8月出生于河北阳原.博士生.主要研究方向为智能信息处理和机器学习等研究. E-mail:zhyuxibj@126.com
- 基金资助:
- 国家自然科学基金 (No.60975026,No.61033007)

New Combination Rule of DST Based on Local Conflict Distribution Strategy

QUAN Wen¹, WANG Xiao-dan¹, WANG Jian^1,2, ZHANG Yu-xi¹

1. The Missile Institute, Air Force Engineering University, Sanyuan, Shaanxi 713800, China;
2. College of Computer, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710072, China

Received:2011-09-05 Revised:2012-03-18 Online:2012-09-25 Published:2012-09-25
- Supported by:
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.60975026, No.61033007)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 冲突证据融合是信息融合中一个非常重要但始终没有很好地解决的问题.本文从选择有效的冲突衡量参数的角度出发,分析了悖论与证据冲突的关系,给出了新的冲突衡量参数,并基于此参数提出了一种新的基于局部冲突分配策略的证据推理组合规则.大量实例表明,提出的证据推理组合规则能够解决现有的证据理论悖论问题,是一种较为通用的证据推理组合规则.

关键词: 冲突证据融合, 证据理论悖论, 证据组合规则

Abstract: Conflict evidence combination remains unsettled in information fusion field.Based on analyzing the relationship between paradox and evidence conflict,we proposed an effective conflict measurement parameter and a new DST based on local conflict distribution strategy.Numerous examples show that the proposed rule can settle paradox effectively.

Key words: conflict evidence combination, evidence theory paradox, evidence combination rule

中图分类号:

TP212.9

权文, 王晓丹, 王坚, 张玉玺. 一种基于局部冲突分配的DST组合规则[J]. 电子学报, 2012, 40(9): 1880-1884.

QUAN Wen, WANG Xiao-dan, WANG Jian, ZHANG Yu-xi. New Combination Rule of DST Based on Local Conflict Distribution Strategy[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2012, 40(9): 1880-1884.

参考文献

[1] A P Dempster.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J].The Annals of Mathematical Statistics,1967,38(2):325-339.
[2] 徐从富,耿卫东,潘云鹤.面向数据融合的DS方法综述[J].电子学报,2001,29 (3):393-396. XU Cong-fu,GENG Wei-dong,PAN Yun-he.Review of Dempster-Shafer method for data fusion[J].Acta Electronica Sinica,2001,29(3):393-396.(in Chinese)
[3] P Smets,R Kennes.The transferable belief model[J].Artificial Intelligence,1994,66:191-243.
[4] 孙怀江,杨静宇.一种相关证据合成方法[J].计算机学报,1999,22(3):1004-1007.
[5] 刘明,袁保宗,唐晓芳.证据理论k-NN规则中确定相似度参数的新方法[J].电子学报,2005,33(4):766-768. LIU Ming, YUAN Bao-zong,TANG Xiao-fang.A new approach to determine the similarity parameters in evidence-theoretic k-NN rule[J].Acta Electronica Sinica,2005,33(4):766-768.(in Chinese)
[6] 何兵.基于分类及不确定墒的DS证据合成及判决方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2003,29(10):927-930.
[7] 邓勇,施文康.一种改进的证据推理组合规则[J].上海交通大学学报,2003,37(8):1275-1278.
[8] 高社生,倪龙强,杨凯.一种新的基于局部冲突分配的证据合成规则[J].西北工业大学学报,2009,27(1):43-46.
[9] 韩德强,韩崇昭,邓勇,等.基于证据方差的加权证据组合[J].电子学报,2011,39(3A):153-157. HAN De-qiang,HAN Chong-zhao,DENG Yong,et al.Weighted combination of conflicting evidence based on evidence variance[J].Acta Electronica Sinica,2011,39(3A):153-157.(in Chinese)
[10] 肖明珠,陈光.一种改进的证据合成公式[J].电子学报,2005,33(9):1714-1716. XIAO Ming-zhu,CHEN Guang-ju.A modified combination rule of evidence theory. Acta Electronica Sinica,2005,33(9):1714-1716.(in Chinese)
[11] 郎风华,谷利泽,杨义先,等.一种基于均衡交补分担准则的证据组合新方法[J].电子学报,2009,37(1):95-100. LANG Feng-hua,GU Li-ze,YANG Yi-xian,et al.A novel evidence combination method based on proportional conjunctive and complementary pooling criterion[J].Acta Electronica Sinica,2009,37(1):95-100.(in Chinese)
[12] 郭华伟,施文康,邓勇,等.一种通用的不确定性推理和决策模型[J].传感技术学报,2006,(4):1176-1180.
[13] Ronald R Yager.On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules[J].Information Sciences,1987,41(2):93-138.
[14] C K Murphy.Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J].Decision Support Systems,2000,29(1):1-9.
[15] 孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):117-119. SUN Quan,YE Xiu-qing,GU Wei-kang.A new combination rules of evidence theory. Acta Electronica Sinica,2000,28(8):117-119.(in Chinese)
[16] J W Guan,D A Bell.Approximate reasoning and evidence theory[J].Information Science,1997,96:207-235.
[17] R Kruse.Uncertainty and Vagueness in Knowledge Based Systems:Numerical Methods. New York:Springer-Verlag,1991.
[18] E Lefevre,P Vannoorenberglle,O Colot.About the use of Dempster-Shafer theory for color image segmentation. First International Conference on Color in Graphics and Image Processing. Saint-Etienne,France:CEPADUES,2000.164-169.
[19] A L Jousselme,éloi Bossé,D Grenier.A new distance between two bodies of evidence [J].Information Fusion,2001,2(2):91-101.
[20] 潘泉,张山鹰,程咏梅,等.证据推理的鲁棒性研究[J].自动化学报,2001,27(6):799-805.
[21] W Liu.Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief function[J].Artificial Intelligence,2006,170:909-924.
[22] 许培达,韩德强,邓勇.一种基本概率赋值转换为概率的最优化方法[J].电子学报, 2011,39(3A):121-125. XU Pei-da,HAN De-qiang,DENG Yong.An optimal transformation of basic probability assignment to probability[J].Acta Electronica Sinica,2011,39(3A):121-125.(in Chinese)
[23] Zadeh L.On the Validity of Dempster’s Rule of Combination of Evidence. Berkely:University of California,1979.
[24] F Smarandache,J Dezert.Information fusion based on new proportional conflict redistribution rules. Proc of the 2005 8th Int Conf on Information Fusion. Philadelphia:IEEE,2005.907-914.

一种基于局部冲突分配的DST组合规则

New Combination Rule of DST Based on Local Conflict Distribution Strategy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics